Skip to main content

Part 3 ~ Miracles: An Answer to Hume

There is a gap between the probable and the proved. How was I to cross it? If I were to stake my whole life on the risen Christ, I wanted proof. I wanted certainty. I wanted to see him eat a bit of fish. I wanted letters of fire across the sky. I got none of these.1
~Sheldon Vanauken 

Recap. We last discussed a bit of what David Hume believed or did not believe about the occurrence of miracles. In this post, we will look at an opposing viewpoint to Hume's position. These posts are not exhaustive on this topic, nor are they intended to be. The purpose of these posts on Miracles is to cause us to ponder some thought provoking questions many have wrestled with over the years. 


photo credit: Thomas Hawk via photopin cc
An Objection. Thomas Sherlock, author of Tryal of Witnesses, presented a mock trial where the apostles are accused of hoaxing the resurrection of Jesus. During the trial it is argued that because the resurrection was a violation of nature, and therefore eyewitness testimony to the resurrection could not establish the resurrection as fact. The argument that the resurrection violated the law of nature in presented in Sherlock's work, mirrored the arguments of Hume. In summation, Sherlock held the view that it was absurd to believe that facts in question could not be proved by testimonial evidence. Further, Sherlock argued that the resurrection did not violate nature. Rather, Sherlock makes the argument that we as humans observe nature and how it has behaved for us in the past; to assume that it will continue behaving as it has in the past, originate with the "prejudices and imaginations of men."2

Parting Thought. Many contemporaries of Hume considered him a deist; that is, one who believes that God created the world but "denies his (God's) supernatural intervention in it on the grounds that the world operates by natural and self-sustaining laws of the Creator."3


If we believe that God created the world and formed it ex nihilo ('out of nothing") then why would we not believe or think the Creator could not or would not intervene with His creation? After all, wasn't creation a miracle in and of itself?




1 Alister E. McGrath, Intellectuals Don't Need God & Other Modern Myths [Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House,  1993], 59.
2 William Lane Craig,Reasonable Faith [Illinois: Crossway, 2008], 254-255. 
3 Norman L. Geisler, Christian Apologetics [Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1976], 151.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

For Your Information

Dear Readers and Subscribers, I am in the middle of an extremely busy semester and finishing papers and projects this week. I just wanted to let you know that over the next two weeks the posts might be delayed but we will be on a regular schedule after the end of these two weeks. Blessings to you as we pursue the Savior in our daily walk. God Bless, Jennifer Joy

Close Calls

For what great nation is there that has a god so near to it as is the Lord our God whenever we call on Him? Deuteronomy 4:7 Sound of the fury or two terriers. There was a time when we had two terriers who were not always fond of each other. Though they were small, they were feisty. I was walking through the kitchen one day when the one terrier upon seeing the other, decided that this was her time to shine and leave her mark. The pearly whites of her teeth began to gleam as she lifted her lip in utter disdain and latched on to her "companion" and would not let go. The usual verbal threats masked in the growling and snarling were not part of this fight; however, the sheer determination to defeat the opponent and win were certain. To say that I was concerned was an understatement. After quite a while of trying to pry the dogs apart and loosen the clenched teeth without success, I finally blurted out, "Jesus, help us!" It was at this exact moment that the one d

Common Ground: The Road Less Traveled

The Presence of God.  Ruth and Naomi found themselves in very trying circumstances after each suffered the loss of a husband and the inescapable grief that accompanies death. Scripture gives us a snapshot into their lives and we get a glimpse of the strong bond of friendship that took place between Ruth and Naomi. Was it the deep sense of   grief that brought these two women together in a way they had never experienced before? Perhaps these women were drawn to each other because they knew they were “alone” in the world.  More importantly, the presence of God is evident by Ruth's response to her mother-in-law.  Ruth reminds us and reminded Naomi of God's presence. The presence of God is the bond that unites our hearts as brothers and sisters in Christ. The Road Less Traveled photo credit:  B Gilmour.  via  photopin   cc Mutual Commitment. Naomi urged Ruth to go home to her mother in Moab hoping that Ruth would find another husband. Ruth refused to leave Naom

BG Badge

BG Badge
Bible Gateway Blogger